RESUMO
AIM: Delamanid is a novel drug for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis, manufactured as 50-mg solid and 25-mg dispersible tablets. We evaluated the effects of dispersing the 50-mg tablet, focusing on the relative bioavailability. METHODS: Delamanid, 50-mg tablets administered dispersed vs swallowed whole, was investigated in a phase I, four-period, crossover study. Two of three dose strengths of delamanid (25, 50 or 100 mg) were given to healthy adult participants, in both whole and dispersed forms, with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected over 168 h after each dose. Delamanid and its metabolite DM-6705 were analysed with a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay. The pharmacokinetics of both analytes were analysed using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling. Palatability and acceptability were determined using a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty-four participants completed the study. The bioavailability of dispersed tablets was estimated to be 107% of whole tablets, with a 90% confidence interval of 99.7-114%, fulfilling bioequivalence criteria. The two formulations were not significantly different regarding either bioavailability or its variability. Bioavailability increased at lower doses, by 34% (26-42%) at 50 mg and by 74% (64-86%) at 25 mg, relative to 100 mg. The majority of participants (93%) found the dispersed formulation acceptable in palatability across all delamanid doses. CONCLUSIONS: Dispersed 50-mg delamanid tablets have similar bioavailability to tablets swallowed whole in adult volunteers. This can be an option for children and other patients who cannot swallow whole tablets, improving access to treatment.
RESUMO
Rationale: Carbapenems are recommended for treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Optimal dosing remains uncertain. Objectives: To evaluate the 14-day bactericidal activity of meropenem, at different doses, with or without rifampin. Methods: Individuals with drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis were randomized to one of four intravenous meropenem-based arms: 2 g every 8 hours (TID) (arm C), 2 g TID plus rifampin at 20 mg/kg once daily (arm D), 1 g TID (arm E), or 3 g once daily (arm F). All participants received amoxicillin/clavulanate with each meropenem dose. Serial overnight sputum samples were collected from baseline and throughout treatment. Median daily fall in colony-forming unit (CFU) counts per milliliter of sputum (solid culture) (EBACFU0-14) and increase in time to positive culture (TTP) in liquid media were estimated with mixed-effects modeling. Serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis on Day 13. Measurements and Main Results: Sixty participants enrolled. Median EBACFU0-14 counts (2.5th-97.5th percentiles) were 0.22 (0.12-0.33), 0.12 (0.057-0.21), 0.059 (0.033-0.097), and 0.053 (0.035-0.081); TTP increased by 0.34 (0.21-0.75), 0.11 (0.052-0.37), 0.094 (0.034-0.23), and 0.12 (0.04-0.41) (log10 h), for arms C-F, respectively. Meropenem pharmacokinetics were not affected by rifampin coadministration. Twelve participants withdrew early, many of whom cited gastrointestinal adverse events. Conclusions: Bactericidal activity was greater with the World Health Organization-recommended total daily dose of 6 g daily than with a lower dose of 3 g daily. This difference was only detectable with solid culture. Tolerability of intravenous meropenem, with amoxicillin/clavulanate, though, was poor at all doses, calling into question the utility of this drug in second-line regimens. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03174184).
